Meh.
Sugarbush made it to # 7 this year. K and Jay didn't make the top 10. I guess they were light on the advertising budget this year.
http://www.skinet.com/ski/node/113195
Here's how they stacked up:
1. Tremblant
2. Whiteface
3. Stowe
4. Okemo
5. Stratton
6. Sugarloaf
7. Sugarbush
8. Sunday River
9. Smuggs
10. Loon
Trouble with you is the trouble with me,
Got two good eyes but we still don’t see!
Meh.
#4. Okemo and #5. Stratton? Really?Originally Posted by Hawk
You seem surprised. Haven't you figured out that these don't mean a damn thing yet? If it was based on what mountains are actually good then it would be a completely different list.Originally Posted by Yard Sale
That is why I stand by my assessment of "meh."Originally Posted by skibum13210.
Nicer are the following ranking that go into the overall ranking
Terrain Variety #1
Overall Satisfaction #2
Service #3
.....And those are a few of the reasons we drive (family of 5) the extra 43 miles up route 100 to experience Sugarbush! It is a long haul from NJ but the extra miles makes all the difference. Sugarbush has the true New England skiing feel, but with more professionalism and sincere welcoming warmth (and fewer Land Rovers) than some of the ?higher rated? areas. IMHO[/quote]
...are the best part of the drive (we rented in Killington before buying in Sugarbush).
Don't all the Land Rovers come from NJ? Oh, wait-- those are Hummers.Originally Posted by Ridgeline
IROC.
Bookmarks