That would be how you would determine if something was working most of the time.Or actually to put it more accurately that if you are measuring time in minutes and out of maybe 3k minutes in a given week that a lift is supposed to be running it is then I'd believe you.
With the amount of lifts and an 8 hour day, I'd find that hard to argue against. My point would be that would not be considered odd in the least, in any resort/ski area.However if you measure in a span of how many days does the mountain go without a lift being down I'd have to argue.
If you only monitor it for 5 minutes, and it was down for one of those minutes it would be down for 20% of the time. In my engineering life, we'd have called that very selective monitoring of the data. We would say that was bad data.If you were to limit that to weekends only when we see most of the volume and it is more evident and likely matters the most then it would be hard to not agree with me.
It is one of the axioms of Murphy's law that shoe laces only break when you are going somewhere. You're right. It was a terrible time for the lifts to go down. They jumped to try to get them back on line. Now, had it been a weekday... They would have jumped to try to get them back on line.
I would agree. I have stated that I have seen maintenance done in the off season. I believe the problem to be the former situation. Is there some data that you have, that there was an insufficient budget for maintenance?has the mountain budgeted in for the right repairs and upgrades to make it work? When something breaks it's an indication that it needs to be fixed because either it was a rare accident or result of lack of long term maintenance. If it's the former there's little that can be done. If it's the later then there's an issue.
And I recognized the lunchtime vacancies was a joke, as was my response.
Bookmarks