Home Gallery Outdoor Gear Directory Register Search FAQ Memberlist Usergroups Log in  
Reply to topic Slidebrook Rescue
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
walks


Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Posts: 114
Location: stuck in a tree well
Reply with quote
Not sure if everyone feels this but the area seems to have a mainstream feel to it now. I think that is what is driving everyone into it. by area I mean take the high traverse, go past the lift and then go skiers left ( the main area).

The sign idea may help in having people second guess going into the area. I wonder though if that would bring more awareness to the entrance.

Powder Puff,

Had a similar situation this year with a guy and his son. Got of the chair and started to go in. Father asked where it went. Explained to him the situation and that he should go and hire a guide. Looked back and sure enough he was following. Now the question comes up. Do I need to feel responsible for this guy? Some say no. Some say yes. I decided to wait and tell him he could follow us down. The Father and son had no problem skiing in there but my problem with what happened is not about ski ability. Maybe they would have found there way down. Most likely they would have. If they hadn't and we decided not to wait? Then what? If I had said "hey come on in and follow me" that would have been different. Already had a group and didn't really want two more. Didn't care much for being put in that situation.

_________________
www.alongweekend.com
View user's profileFind all posts by walksSend private message
Sponsored Links
walks


Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Posts: 114
Location: stuck in a tree well
Reply with quote
Treeskier wrote:
I agree with a ski area boundary sign. As for the kid. I was leading a group when we came upon the dad. I subsequently learned that the kid had been in there with his blazer group before and had told dad I know where to go. But then he took a low line on the traverse and subsequently got lost. He obviously did not and did not know the correct woods procedures. I also made several calls to advise people of the situation. Ironically I then came across some adults looking for another adult. My friend found him and I was able to re-communicate with the lost party to re-connect them all. While I do truly love Slidebrook and am a Boy Scout leader. I do fell we need to better job to educate everyone going into the trees / Slidebrook. At Mad River there are signs everywhere that state their woods policy. I think it would be advisable to do the same. Maybe at the bottom of North Lynx Lift. In the past a Blazer/womans turns/black diamond club trip to Slidebrook is suppose to be an ultimate trip/educational adventure, but it does seem that there are now a real lot going in. Could be the great snow! But if a group goes in many times they think they know it.......?!


We saw the dad at the bottom and he said his kid had been in there at least 50 times. ?????????????? Goes to show it only takes one time.

_________________
www.alongweekend.com
View user's profileFind all posts by walksSend private message
HowieT2


Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 660
Location: New York
Reply with quote
Don't blame the kids, it is the Dad who is completely responsible.
I was in there Sunday with my 11 year old son and 7 year old daughter. He knows slidebrook better than I do thanks to our friend Mr. Atkinson and adventure camp. My daughter had just gotten finished doing lift line at Castlerock with her blazer group and is probably a better skier than either my son or me. That being said, each of us has a 2 way radio and a backpack with drink/food and I have a cell phone. They lead and I follow and don't let them out of my sight.

With respect to the 2 way radios, I find them to be unreliable, even under the best of conditions. I had my in laws buy my son the top of the line "25 mile" motorolas and while they work some of the times, I'd hate to have to count on them. First of all, with children, it is very difficult to understand what they are saying, especially if they are excited (lost, hurt, hungry, boot out of binding, etc.). As soon as ATT offers a kids cellphone with a GPS locator I'm all over it.
View user's profileFind all posts by HowieT2Send private message
skiladi


Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 288
Reply with quote
castlerock wrote:
It isn't a problem with the kids. My kids ski better than 75% of the folks who go into slidebrook (Dad brag/off)

The issue is the adults who go in there, that don't have the judgement, skills or techniques to bring lesser skilled/experienced folks (kids or adults) into an un-patrolled environment. Frankly they are Guide skills,

Simple things like groups of three (the aforementioned party was a party of two).

Having an experienced person "sweep" the group. (A REQUIREMENT with kids).

Basic equipment: whistles, phones, radios (the aforementioned group did have two radios, but the father had them both).

When you bring your kids in there, you are a guide and you need to think and act like one


Agree with you. As mentioned in the post about bus etiquette the kids that can handle the terrain have every right to enjoy it. The parent needs to use their brain.
View user's profileFind all posts by skiladiSend private message
Tough issue....
smootharc


Joined: 21 Nov 2005
Posts: 466
Location: CNY & MRV
Reply with quote
....but I'm not sure one skilled, qualified parent and two kids under 16 years old (or so) count as "three in the trees".

If daddy (or mommy) goes down, then he would need to have his injuries attended by a youth (a likely freaked out kid), while his other (likely freaked out kid) is expected to head off to navigate safely and find help. Not good. If a kid gets hurt, then daddy has to decide to either staying (sending off a freaked out kid to find help) or leaving....a hurt freaked out kid with a freaked out kid. Then there's the issue of describing clearly and accurately where you are in SB if you have radio/phone contact. "Uh....we're right by this tree....).

Paint me paranoid, but I think, ideally, if there are kids involved, two knowledgeable and fully equipped adult leaders would be considered minimum from a safety standpoint.

It's one thing to be aware in the abstract about what to do IF things go wrong....and a whole other thing to react quickly and adjust correctly WHEN someone in your group has gotten hurt or lost.

Glad this weekend's drama had a happy ending. As a parent (and one who's done some stupid things) I can only imagine those few hours.

As a quick aside, in addition to other safety gear, we all carry these in our jackets:

http://www.stormwhistles.com/
View user's profileFind all posts by smootharcSend private message
atkinson


Joined: 01 Dec 2005
Posts: 328
Reply with quote
"In the past a Blazer/womans turns/black diamond club trip to Slidebrook is suppose to be an ultimate trip/educational adventure, but it does seem that there are now a real lot going in. Could be the great snow! But if a group goes in many times they think they know it.......?!"

Coming from the guy that spends more time in there than just about anybody, I can't believe you're complaining about too many people, too many trips. How about you take a few less runs so the rest of us can have a chance? Wink

Adventure is what we do. And when the snow is good, we're going to go. Just like you. And it's still an ultimate trip/ educational adventure, regardless of how many times we go. We impart consistent and comprehensive lessons in backcountry travel to these kids and parents, but nobody is immune from making mistakes.

John
View user's profileFind all posts by atkinsonSend private message
win


Joined: 17 Mar 2006
Posts: 502
Location: warren
Reply with quote
This was a fortunate outcome. What I took away was how concerned everyone was when they heard that a child had been separated and might be lost. People contributed advice on where they thought they heard a child's voice, people volunteered to help and a guest found the boy and called in on a cell phone and patrol went in with a sled. One of the great things about this place is how eager almost everyone is to help out when needed and to do the right thing.
View user's profileFind all posts by winSend private message
walks


Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Posts: 114
Location: stuck in a tree well
Reply with quote
Big round of applause for the patrol for doing such a great job.

Win, on another note, my wife dragged me and my kids into Timbers friday night for dinner. Had a great meal and the atmosphere was nice. Also, thanks for the confirmation about the lincoln gap road. He was following his GPS and would have added some time onto his drive if he followed it.

_________________
www.alongweekend.com
View user's profileFind all posts by walksSend private message
ski_resort_observer


Joined: 19 Nov 2005
Posts: 1113
Location: Waitsfield, Vt
Reply with quote
This is out of bounds skiing, like many other resorts, if it gets to be a big problem with people going in who are not prepared or not experienced you either close it down or require people entering to have transceivers. Hopefully it won't get to that point. A sign identifing the entrance would be a huge mistake at this point. A warning sign might help.

_________________
www.firstlightphotographics.com
Sugarbusher since 1970
Skiing is a dance, and the mountain always leads.
View user's profileFind all posts by ski_resort_observerSend private messageVisit poster's website
atkinson


Joined: 01 Dec 2005
Posts: 328
Reply with quote
I hope you are kidding SRO. Your suggestions are unworkable and inappropriate. Not to nitpick or anything. Wink

John
View user's profileFind all posts by atkinsonSend private message
ski_resort_observer


Joined: 19 Nov 2005
Posts: 1113
Location: Waitsfield, Vt
Reply with quote
atkinson wrote:
I hope you are kidding SRO. Your suggestions are unworkable and inappropriate. Not to nitpick or anything. Wink

John


I hear what your saying but I fear that we have been lucky so far in that there has not been any life threatning injuries or god forbid, a death in there. If that does change then it's going to be a whole new ballgame regarding Slidebrook access from the resort. This has happened to other resorts, mostly out west, it can happen here IMHO. We might not have the avalanche dangers but out of bounds skiers/riders lost and injured is already happening. It's the old story...a few dumb apples can screw it up for everyone.

_________________
www.firstlightphotographics.com
Sugarbusher since 1970
Skiing is a dance, and the mountain always leads.
View user's profileFind all posts by ski_resort_observerSend private messageVisit poster's website
atkinson


Joined: 01 Dec 2005
Posts: 328
Reply with quote
Risk is part of life. Accepting personal responsibility is key. Injuries and deaths happen every day on our roads and we don't talk about closing them.

John
View user's profileFind all posts by atkinsonSend private message
Re: Tough issue....
freeheel_skier


Joined: 30 Nov 2005
Posts: 690
Location: The Happy Valley
Reply with quote
smootharc wrote:
....but I'm not sure one skilled, qualified parent and two kids under 16 years old (or so) count as "three in the trees".

If daddy (or mommy) goes down, then he would need to have his injuries attended by a youth (a likely freaked out kid), while his other (likely freaked out kid) is expected to head off to navigate safely and find help. Not good. If a kid gets hurt, then daddy has to decide to either staying (sending off a freaked out kid to find help) or leaving....a hurt freaked out kid with a freaked out kid. Then there's the issue of describing clearly and accurately where you are in SB if you have radio/phone contact. "Uh....we're right by this tree....).

Paint me paranoid, but I think, ideally, if there are kids involved, two knowledgeable and fully equipped adult leaders would be considered minimum from a safety standpoint.

It's one thing to be aware in the abstract about what to do IF things go wrong....and a whole other thing to react quickly and adjust correctly WHEN someone in your group has gotten hurt or lost.

Glad this weekend's drama had a happy ending. As a parent (and one who's done some stupid things) I can only imagine those few hours.

As a quick aside, in addition to other safety gear, we all carry these in our jackets:

http://www.stormwhistles.com/


Very good point. I am painted the same color paranoid as you!!!!

_________________
"Quietly Heartbroken Tennis Player."
View user's profileFind all posts by freeheel_skierSend private message
freeheel_skier


Joined: 30 Nov 2005
Posts: 690
Location: The Happy Valley
Reply with quote
atkinson wrote:
Risk is part of life. Accepting personal responsibility is key. Injuries and deaths happen every day on our roads and we don't talk about closing them.

John


DITTO! Cool

_________________
"Quietly Heartbroken Tennis Player."
View user's profileFind all posts by freeheel_skierSend private message
ski_resort_observer


Joined: 19 Nov 2005
Posts: 1113
Location: Waitsfield, Vt
Reply with quote
atkinson wrote:
Risk is part of life. Accepting personal responsibility is key. Injuries and deaths happen every day on our roads and we don't talk about closing them.

John


Yup, closing access is not a solution but rethinking how you handle usage in an increasingly popular place like Slide Brook is inevitable. I think Slide Brook is reaching mythical status here in New England. I think that's a good thing.

_________________
www.firstlightphotographics.com
Sugarbusher since 1970
Skiing is a dance, and the mountain always leads.
View user's profileFind all posts by ski_resort_observerSend private messageVisit poster's website
Slidebrook Rescue
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT - 5 Hours  
Page 2 of 3  

  
  
 Reply to topic  

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
Design by phpBBStyles.com | Styles Database.
Content © AlpineZone.com