 |
 | |  |
BushMogulMaster
| Joined: 19 Nov 2006 |
| Posts: 994 |
| Location: Fayston, near Mount Ellen |
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 10:05 am |
|
 |
 |
| beelze wrote: |
safe to say they groomed most of it last night? (sacriledge i know but cant have
the stuff blowing away either at this point!) |
Pretty much everything except FIS and Exterm at Mt. Ellen
| Plowboy wrote: |
| Lets see, @ this time on the SB site the weather forecast is for Mon the 18th and the snow report was done at 9:25 am.!!!! I would have to think that most people who are going to ski or ride are going to be looking at the site earlier than 9:25!!!!!!!!!! There must be somebody up on that mountain early enough to give an acurate snow report!!!! Heck I would even call them @ 5:00 am on snow days, but it would only be a base report. |
It's a little bit ridiculous, isn't it? They really should update it several times per day. Once before 6:00, then an 8 or 9 update, a noon update, a mid afternoon update, and an evening update. Each update should only take about 5 minutes. That means, based on my suggestion, 25 minutes total out of one day. Come on... can't someone spare 25 minutes to keep customers happy? Of course, gathering the necessary information to make the update would take some more time. But there is generally someone on the mountain by 6:00am, there are definitely people on the hil from 8 till after 5, and there are generally snowmakers or groomers on the hill at night. There could be designated personnel each day to make a report at a certain time. In this scenario, no further employees are required, and the data can be gathered while the aforementioned employees are simply doing their jobs. Easy fix. Accurate reports. Everyone's happy. No prob.
That's not good. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that type of thing falls under the marketing umbrella???
|
|
 |  |
 | Sponsored Links |  |
 | SB's Snow Reporting Procedure |  |
Insider
| Joined: 20 Mar 2006 |
| Posts: 5 |
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 12:18 pm |
|
 |
 |
0530- Snow Reporter gathers snowfall totals from available on-hill personnel; ie, if a groomer is near the summit, get his measurement. If no personnel are up high, use the base read behind the Valley House.
0730-0745 (Weekends) 0830-0845 (Weekdays)- Patrol reports new-snow depths from mid and summit stations. A patroler has been scheduled to begin summit measurements by 0630. This will start soon.
This morning at 0600 two inches was measured outside of the VH. At 0728, snowmaking personnel called in four inches from near the LP mid station. At 0902, Patrol radioed in with 5 to 6 inches.
With regards to what other mountains report, Sugarbush only reports what falls on its mountains.
The time stamp on the website: It reflects the time of the last update. For example, if you had looked at it this morning around 0700, you would have seen the "6:20 AM" stamp. The current stamp of "9:25 AM" is still there because nothing has changed since 9:25 AM; 5 to 6 inches of snow still fell, the lifts are still spinning and there has been no adjustment to the ticket prices.
|
|
 |  |
 | |  |
 |  |
 | |  |
win
| Joined: 17 Mar 2006 |
| Posts: 502 |
| Location: warren |
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 3:13 pm |
|
 |
 |
Wish we had that much. 5" is what we measured up top! Maybe there was a stash blown in that measured 8-10" but that is not what fell and what we would report. Next time!!!!!!! We should have gotten that info out earlier in the morning once we have some people on the mountain. It will get more timely.
|
|
 |  |
 | |  |
BushMogulMaster
| Joined: 19 Nov 2006 |
| Posts: 994 |
| Location: Fayston, near Mount Ellen |
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 3:57 pm |
|
 |
 |
| win wrote: |
| Wish we had that much. 5" is what we measured up top! Maybe there was a stash blown in that measured 8-10" but that is not what fell and what we would report. Next time!!!!!!! We should have gotten that info out earlier in the morning once we have some people on the mountain. It will get more timely. |
Thanks for the report, Win.
I was just up on Mt Ellen, and in the wind-protected areas I found approximately 6-7" (not the 8-10 I mentioned earlier, but more than 5). A lot of what fell was blown around last night and today. But, there's no sense in arguing over the amount of snow. All that matters is that we finally got some!  Yes... earlier reports would be nice.......
Looks good for T2B at Mt Ellen by Friday It will be quite a relief not having to download, and having NRX open will REALLY help with lift lines at Summit. Can't wait! 
|
|
 |  |
 | |  |
Lostone
Moderator Team
| Joined: 18 Nov 2005 |
| Posts: 2030 |
| Location: Sugarbush South |
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 9:53 pm |
|
 |
 |
Well, I would have liked 6-7" but the most I saw was at the left of Lower Elbow, where there was less than 4". There were pockets on Exterminator that had more, but there were ice bumps right next to them with 0".
I think what I'm saying is that where you measure makes a large difference in what measurement you give. I would count it as 4", because that is what I found to ski in. And most of what I skied in was much less, as it had been groomed in. And I think that was great, as there was snow on most of most of the trails.
I love powder skiing, but I'd have hated to have a few good powder runs and then just scrape across the ice. And Ithought the skiing was quite good, today. I was in total shock when I saw the line on Summit, on a Wednesday!  On the good side, the lifties saw the need for the singles' line and set it up.
And I, also, am hoping for t-2-b at both mountains, with as much extra as we can get. 
|
_________________ .
Two roads diverged in a wood,
and I- I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.  |
    |
 |
|
|
 |  |
 | |  |
 | Skied Ellen 2-3:40 Tuesday. |  |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 2 of 3
|
|
|
|
|  |