 |
 | |  |
trtaylor
| Joined: 25 Aug 2006 |
| Posts: 7 |
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 3:20 pm |
|
 |
 |
| Lostone wrote: |
| trtaylor wrote: |
| The above is from Camelback, an 800 vertical feet hill located in the Poconos of Pennsylvania. I think their natural snowfall averages 50" or so per year. |
First of all, we don't mind you jumping in. That's what we're here for. Quite the opposite... welcome to the board.
As to the 800' vertical, that is a little less than our Gatehouse area.
If you look at the Sugarbush trail map, it is the mountain on the left and the high speed quad on the right. Most of that is covered, tho Castlerock Connection and Sleeper Road aren't.
Now, we might not have the snowmaking capacity you do, on that part. But if you look at everything around that area... we have a lot more mountain!
C'mon up and visit, when we're full open. we have a lot of skiing... and we have a lot of great skiing!
Do I sound like an ambassador?  |
Thanks. I check this board almost every day and was certain I would be made to feel welcome. First class group of people here.
As far as the invite to the 'bush, I do indeed plan on skiing there sometime this winter. And I'll let you know when I plan to get there.
Thanks.
|
|
 |  |
 | Sponsored Links |  |
 |  |
 | |  |
 |  |
 | |  |
random_ski_guy
| Joined: 03 Dec 2005 |
| Posts: 413 |
| Location: cos cob, ct |
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 3:50 pm |
|
 |
 |
low e is great. good for keeping operating costs down, good for making lower density snow (higher quality) and better for the environment (less electrical consumption to run air compressors). but all the low e guns in the world don't make up for a general lack of uphill pumping capacity and water to convert to snow. you need uphill gpm, you need water.
of course natural is the best, and sugarbush much more than most.
|
|
 |  |
 | |  |
Mike_451
| Joined: 27 Oct 2006 |
| Posts: 353 |
| Location: MRV At Heart |
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 3:56 pm |
|
 |
 |
exactly, and all the snowmaking asside, there would still be lots of great skiing at Sugarbush, just as there is at MRG, just not as much of it. This can't be said about many of the resorts south of Sugarbush.
Regarding the uphill capicity, I think this is what is preventing the use of Low E guns at Glen Ellen, as there simpily isn't enough water from the pond at ME , and enough pumping capicity to benifit from the added volume from Low E guns.
Hence they are supposedly looking into interconnecting the systems, or adding an additional remote pond to Glen Ellen.
|
|
 | Re: Picked up a Vermont Sports & |  |
 | Re: Picked up a Vermont Sports & |  |
HowieT2
| Joined: 28 Feb 2006 |
| Posts: 656 |
| Location: New York |
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:28 pm |
|
 |
 |
Is there any snowmaking purpose to the small reservoir that was dug next to cat's Meow this summer? If I recall correctly the main purpose was for fire suppression for the new buildings.
|
|
 |  |
 | |  |
 |  |
 | |  |
Mike_451
| Joined: 27 Oct 2006 |
| Posts: 353 |
| Location: MRV At Heart |
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:39 pm |
|
 |
 |
I think they have free match books at Paradise, I also got some free chicken wings at the end of the day once, because they were going to trash them anyway, and I have a friend who got a burger for free for the same reason.
Speeking of Snowmaking, mabey we should all drop by Paradise, buy a couple bags of ice, take them up to the mountain, and dump them on lower organgrinder, unfourtionalty my logic behind that Idea is flawed, because there aren't a thousand of us who would consider doing that, and I doubt they have more than a dozen or two bags of Ice, but I guess I had to throw something in this that was relative to the topic.
I guess for that to work, we would have to buy out Paridse, Warren Store (I guess that have ice) Meheurans, the Valaro, the Mobil station in Irasville, the "VG", Macs (it would probably burn down agin before we got to it), Whatever that place is in Moretown, and the Deli in Middlesex, and I know there a couple of places in Bristol, and probably every place in the danm state.
Man, am I in withdraw from hitting lines of that wite, dry, powdery substance that sends chills down your spine or what?
Mabey I should head to K-Mart for some Ski Rehab, o wait there sure as heck isnt any powder there either
Guess I will have to be paitent, with the rest of yall, before I can take the chair lift up HIGH....
Man, what a corny attempt at a cheap o analogy
Well enough of this rant of shear boredom.
Off to patch my bases up with P-tex, so I can chew them up agian on sunday.
|
|
 |  |
 | Low E |  |
BushMogulMaster
| Joined: 19 Nov 2006 |
| Posts: 994 |
| Location: Fayston, near Mount Ellen |
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:47 pm |
|
 |
 |
I suppose it's my turn to get technical regarding Low E and temps...
The industry's most robust Low E gun is the Ratnik Sky Giant IV, cabable of turning 280 gallons of water to snow in one minute. That's a lot of snow. However, that assumes 8-14 degree temps, and 600 PSI. 8-14 degree aren't all that frequent, and from my knowledge and research, neither South or North have nearly the pumping power to retain 600 PSI the whole way up the mountain (due to the loss per foot of PSI pumping through the pipes). This gun is capable of operating at up to 29.7 degrees, which is not bad. However, at 29.7 degrees with 250 PSI (a much more reasonable number) this gun is only cabable of converting 44 GPM. This is still a decent number, but remember... this is the most powerful Low E gun on the market, and in turn, quite expensive. These specs also assume 36 degree water and 34 degree air. While this is not a problem in mid winter, early season it may be an issue. Now, in layman's terms, since 1 Acre Foot of Snow = 139,322 Gallons of Water, it would take about three days to make 1 acre foot of snow (one foot of snow over one acre) at 29 degrees. That's not very much snow.
So, to recapitulate, Low E guns need much lower temps and much more water pressure to make the volume of snow that they are capable of. This is not to say that Sugarbush should not continue to add Low E guns to the fleet. On the contrary, I think it is a crucial component of snowmaking. However, it is also necessary to retain a reasonable number of standard air/water snowguns. Several of Ratnik's Snow Giant guns are capable of making limited amounts of snow at up to 48 degrees. This is, of course, rather uneconomical. But they are obviously useful when the temps are getting in the upper 20s and lower 30s.
|
|
 |  |
 | |  |
BushMogulMaster
| Joined: 19 Nov 2006 |
| Posts: 994 |
| Location: Fayston, near Mount Ellen |
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:14 pm |
|
 |
 |
Okay, I'm going to elaborate a little more about the pressure issues. I mentioned that the great numbers on the Ratnik gun assumed 600 PSI, and that 250 PSI is a more reasonable number.
While the water pumps are quite capable of pumping at higher than 600 PSI, one must take into account the loss of pressure due to vertical rise. For every 2.31 vertical feet, 1 PSI is lost. This being the case, by mid at Glen Ellen (approx. 1500' vert) the water pressure has already dropped by 649.35 PSI. At mid, there is a pump house to boost the pressure. However, it is still unreasonable to assume 600 PSI over the whole mountain, especially at the top.
Not only is there pressure lost due to vertical rise, but also due to friction in the pipes. Calculating this is a hugely complex process that I'm not going to bother with figuring out right now... but just realize that this also affects the pressure.
Being realistic, even if it was possible to pump at a pressure great enough to sustain 600 PSI all over the mountain, this pressure would be so great it would likely burst many of the older pipes and possibly destroy the entire infrastructure.
There is so much to consider when discussing upgrading snowmaking. Unfortunately, it's not as simple as saying, "let's just buy more guns and bigger pumps!" If it was that simple, Sugarbush would likely be making hundreds of upgrades all the time. But, it's not that simple and it probably never will be.
So, what I'm getting at is....... upgrading is good, but one must always realize the upsides and pitfalls of certain upgrades. I trust that Win knows what he's doing and has the right people to do the job. I know Hardy has an extensive background in snowmaking, and I'm sure through the course of the years we will see intelligent and reasonable upgrades to the system.
Alright, I'm done ranting (for now!).
|
|
 |  |
 | |  |
 |  |
 | Solving the big picture |  |
 | Re: Solving the big picture |  |
 |  |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 4 of 5
|
|
|
|
|  |